Seeing Avatar in Beijing, Almost a Mission Impossible

avatar movie poster

Everyone is crazy about Avatar here in Beijing but most people who want to see the movie are not able to due to…too many people.

A friend of mine went to the movie theater last Wednesday at 8AM and discover that there were literally 1,000 people inline before her to purchase an IMAX 3D Avatar ticket.

She gave up and left the theater.

She ultimately settled for the regular 3D version which she waited inline for 5 hours.

Beijing has almost 20 million residents and only 4 IMAX theaters.  As you can see the demand greatly outnumbers the supply.

When Avatar first came out a few weeks ago, I told all my friends I would not see any other version except the IMAX version; now I’ll be glad if I can get a regular 3D version.

Let’s hope Avatar live up to all these hype and not disappoint me when I get a ticket.

Posted in China | Tagged | 12 Comments

Most Efficient Team on the Web

So I was trying to post a translation of Google’s “New Approach to China” announcement on Kaixin001 (Chinese version of Facebook) yesterday.

I failed.

The first time I posted, the post vanished after 10 minutes; I thought I posted it wrong and posted it again.  The post was up for 30 minutes, in which time two people forwarded my post to their friends, after which, the post and my friends’ forwards vanished and there’s no trace of it anywhere.

I’m not shocked that the translation got erased, I’m shocked at the speed it got erased.  The team working on ensuring China’s “free” Internet is mind-blowing efficient.

Posted in Internet, Ugly Side of Life | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Google to Leave China?

From the Official Google Blog for those who can’t access the blog from China:

A new approach to China
1/12/2010 03:00:00 PM

Like many other well-known organizations, we face cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis. In mid-December, we detected a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google. However, it soon became clear that what at first appeared to be solely a security incident–albeit a significant one–was something quite different.

First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses–including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors–have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.

Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.

Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users’ computers.

We have already used information gained from this attack to make infrastructure and architectural improvements that enhance security for Google and for our users. In terms of individual users, we would advise people to deploy reputable anti-virus and anti-spyware programs on their computers, to install patches for their operating systems and to update their web browsers. Always be cautious when clicking on links appearing in instant messages and emails, or when asked to share personal information like passwords online. You can read more here about our cyber-security recommendations. People wanting to learn more about these kinds of attacks can read this U.S. government report (PDF), Nart Villeneuve’s blog and this presentation on the GhostNet spying incident.

We have taken the unusual step of sharing information about these attacks with a broad audience not just because of the security and human rights implications of what we have unearthed, but also because this information goes to the heart of a much bigger global debate about freedom of speech. In the last two decades, China’s economic reform programs and its citizens’ entrepreneurial flair have lifted hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty. Indeed, this great nation is at the heart of much economic progress and development in the world today.

We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that “we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China.”

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered–combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web–have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.

Posted by David Drummond, SVP, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer

中文翻译:

像许多其他著名组织一样,谷歌也经常面临不同程度的黑客攻击.12月中旬,我们侦测到一个针对企业基础设施的高度复杂和有目标的攻击.这次攻击源自中国,并导致谷歌的知识财产被窃取.但是,不久后我们发现起初貌似仅仅只是次安全事故(尽管很重大)的这次攻击,其实大有不同.

首先,这次攻击不仅仅是针对谷歌.作为调查的一部分,我们发现至少20家其他各行业(包括互联网,财经,技术,媒体和化学等行业)的大型公司也类似地成为攻击目标.我们目前正在告知这些公司,并与相关美国政府机构合作.

第二,我们有证据显示袭击者的首要目标是进入中国人权活动家的Gmail帐号.根据目前的调查我们相信他们的攻击并未达成这个目标.只有2个Gmail帐号被攻入,但活动仅限于帐号信息(比如何时创建的Gmail帐号)和邮件标题栏,而邮件内容本身是安全的.

第三,作为本次调查中与谷歌被袭无关的部分,我们发现若干美国,中国和欧洲的倡导中国人权的Gmail用户的帐号经常性地被第三方访问.这些账户并未因谷歌的安全漏洞被进入,更可能通过钓鱼诈骗或在用户电脑上安插恶意软件实现.

我们利用从这次攻击中收集到的信息进行基础设施和竞购性的改进以加强谷歌和谷歌用户的安全.

我们采取非同寻常的措施:与广大受众分享有关近期袭击的信息.因为我们发掘出事件的安全和人权方面的意义,也因为这些信息直指全球范围内关于言论自由辩论的核心.过去20年,中国的经济改革和中国公民的企业家才能帮数亿中国人走出贫困.这个伟大的国家的确是当今世界经济发展进步的中心.

为中国人民增加接触信息途径和一个更开放的互联网带来的益处压倒了我们对删减搜索结果的不适,带着这个信念,我们在2006年1月开办了Google.cn.当时我们澄清”我们会小心监察中国的状况,包括新的法律和其他对我们服务的限制.如果我们认定我们无法达成实现勾勒出的目标,我们会毫不犹豫地重新考虑进入中国的方式.”

近日的袭击和这些袭击所暴露的监视行为,以及和过去一年里进一步限制网上自由言论的努力,使我们做出结论:我们应该重新审视我们在华业务的可行性.我们决定我们不再自愿删减Google.cn的搜索结果,未来几周我们会和中国政府讨论在法律范围内我们以何种基础来经营一个未经过滤的搜索引擎,如果谷歌还在中国有搜索引擎业务的话.我们清楚这可能意味着不得不关闭Google.cn,还可能撤出在中国的办公室.

这个决定对我们异常艰难,我们清楚这决定意义深远.我们想要澄清这次行动由谷歌在美国的管理人员推动,谷歌在中国的雇员并无知晓和参与.他们用难以置信的努力使Google.cn成为今天的成功.我们将专注于负责任地解决这些棘手的问题.

First of all, I applaud Google’s decision to fight the Chinese government on the issue of search censorship; however, I don’t see China backing down on the censorship issue and I don’t see Google completely pulls its operations from China.  It would be interesting to see how this plays out.

On a side note, this is just despicable:

The search term was Tiananmen (天安门) and the note at the end of the search page translates to: Due to local government regulations, some results are not shown.

Posted in China, Internet | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Donation to Yale Sparks Debate

Yale University received a pledge of $8,888,888 from Chinese investor Lei Zhang to help build a new business-school campus and to fund international scholarships.

The donation will primarily help build the new SOM campus, while a portion will provide scholarship support for the International Relations Program at Yale’s new Jackson Institute of Global Affairs, as well as fund a variety of China-related activities at the university.

Opinions at home have been split in online forums since the story broke a few days ago. On pinggu.org, a forum run by Renmin University of China where Zhang was enrolled as a student of International Finance in 1989, netizens including alumni of the university have taken sides.

Some asked why Zhang, who graduated from Yale less than 10 years ago, chose an overseas institution rather than his Chinese university for the donation. But a larger group of online users voiced support for Zhang’s move and said there is still room for improvement regarding management of universities in China.

One netizen calls Zhang a dumbass and asked why he didn’t donate the money to those in China who cannot afford to go to school. “Were you born with the knowledge you had before going to America?” demanded one netizen.
Other netizen praised Zhang’s decision and added that “if it were given in China, it would be a miracle if there were $80,000 left to be properly used in the end.”

Zhang said Yale changed his life and taught him the spirit of giving. In his profile he wrote: “Yale has been helping China for more than 100 years. Many Chinese leaders were educated at Yale. But the relationship has been one-way for too long and I want to help change that.”

Zhang, who graduated from the Yale School of Management in 2002, worked for the Yale Investments Office under Chief Investment Officer David Swensen, according to the statement. In 2005, Zhang founded Hillhouse Capital Management Ltd., a Beijing-based investment fund that manages $2.5 billion.

What’s your take on Zhang’s donation to Yale?

Posted in China | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Beijing, leave or stay?

Thirty-year-old Xue Jinyong attended college, fell in love and got married in Beijing; in fact he and his wife have lived in Beijing for 10 years. Now they are leaving to find a better life.

With a combined monthly income of about 11,000 Yuan (about $1,617), the couple had hopes to purchase a second-hand apartment at the out skirt of the city that is priced at 1.35 million Yuan.

However, even with the savings of the white-collar couple and that of their parents, they still could not afford the minimum down payment of about 400,000 Yuan.

“After days of consulting with relatives and friends, we decided to move to Taiyuan, where the average housing price is only one fourth of Beijing’s 20,000 Yuan per square meter. I can buy a big apartment and we can finally live in our own home,” said Xue.
With housing prices skyrocketing out of control in metropolises like Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou these days, buying an apartment in becoming a luxury many people cannot afford.
According to Beijing Municipal Statistics Bureau, the per capita annual income in 2008 was 44,715 Yuan, while apartments are selling for an average 20,000 Yuan per square meter.

This translates to an apartment of 80 square meters would costs almost 1.6 million Yuan, which would require a household of two wage-earners to repay with all of their salaries for about 17 years, excluding the interests.
Statistics from Goldman Sachs showed over the past six years, the housing price hikes had outpaced income rises by 30 percentage points in Shanghai and 80 percentage points in Beijing.

Easy credit, property speculation and local government’s lucrative land sales all contribute to the high housing prices according to the Institute of Finance and Banking of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
Xue’s feelings were mixed.

“I can finally give my family an apartment, but personally I think it is a setback in my lifetime,” he said, lowering his head and staring at the ground.

What would you have done?

Posted in China | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Americans Working in China, Culture Clash

Hannah Seligson of the New York Times wrote a piece on cultural clash for Americans working in China.

In the article, Seligson highlighted the rift between American and Chinese workers working in China due to “differences in work experience, pay levels, and communication.”

Attracted by China’s rapid economic growth, lower jobless rate, and abundance of opportunities, more and more Americans are coming to China for employment. As a result, more Chinese and Americans are working side by side than ever before. These cross-cultural partnerships, while beneficial in many ways, has created many friction at the work place due to differences in upbringing.

For example, the Americans have had more exposure to free-market principles; they were brought up in a more commercial environment and most American students have had internship experience in college. On the other hand, the current fresh-out-of-college Chinese workforce were born around or shortly after Deng Xiaoping opened up China to the West, so China has evolved from a government-regulated economy to a more free-market system. However, the Chinese have a deeper understanding of Confucianism and Communism, two great influences that shapes China’s culture and economy.

Moreover, the Chinese now rising in the work force were raised and educated in a system that tended to prize obedience and rote learning; the American counterpart, however, have had more leeway to question authority and speak their minds.

No matter how different two groups are, the benefit of American and Chinese working together is great. “China needs workers who understand China and the West, so they can develop a business presence and influence in overseas markets. Likewise, America needs people who truly understand the Chinese, in order to compete and cooperate.”

Do you have American or Chinese co-workers?

Posted in China | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Year-end Top 10: Official Say Stupid Things

1. “We are of high-level positions. So don’t bother to call the police.”

Yu Fuqin slapped a 19-year-old tour guide twice in the face for touching an ancient mural in Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang. When questioned about the issue by security staff, Yu Fuqin’s husband stepped in and said, “We are of high-level positions. So don’t bother to call the police.” It turned out that the husband, Zhou Wei, is a lieutenant colonel of the No. 221 Regiment Corps and the wife is a party secretary of a hospital attached to the regiment.

Consequence: the husband and wife were removed from their posts after an online outrage against their behavior.

2. “Why doesn’t the public reveal their assets first? And why don’t the entrepreneurs make their profits public to their employees?”

When journalist asked a provincial member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) about officials’ asset declaration program, this official said, “Why doesn’t the public reveal their assets first? And why don’t the entrepreneurs make their profits public to their employees?”

Consequence: Unknown.

3. “I will have your website shut down if you dare to report it.”

An education official was slapped in the face by a female teacher during a banquet. When asked by a journalist about the incident, the official told the journalist, “I will have your website shut down if you dare to report it.”

Consequence: The official remains in his post and the teacher was suspended in early September.

4. “Go straight to the fifth floor. Don’t choose the first or second floor.”

A 66-year-old villager sought help from Shi Guozhong, a local official from Chengde, Hebei province. When Shi refused to help the villager, the 66-year-old claimed he would commit suicide by jumping from a building. Shi Guozhong told the villager, “It’s none of my business. Go straight to the fifth floor. Don’t choose the first or second floor.”

Consequence: Unknown.

5. “You are doomed to be punished if you fight against the government. Any action against the government is illegal.”

Throwing a self-made Molotov cocktail at authorities is illegal but stating “you are doomed to be punished if you fight against the government. Any action against the government is illegal” is just stupid. Pan Rong from Minhang district of Shanghai was proclaimed “a brave woman” by netizens for throwing the cocktail at authorities to protest the forcible demolition of her house. She and her husband failed to prevent the demolition and were imprisoned for eight months for throwing the cocktail.

Consequence: house demolished and owner imprisoned.

6. “You are a mouthpiece for the party (CPC) or the people?”

After luxury houses were built in a region intended for affordable housing in Zhengzhou, Henan province, journalists interviewed the local official Lu Jun. Instead, Lu Jun asked the journalists if they were “a mouthpiece for the party or the people.” Lu implied that the ruling party has interests at odds with the people.

Consequence: Lu was suspended from his post.

7. “Build, baby, build! We will make up for your loss.”

Wang Aimin, mayor of Langfang of Hebei province, issued a slogan to attract investment to the real estate industry. He said, “Real estate is a good industry to invest in and we will offset all the losses of the developers who come to invest – by providing free land as compensation.”

Consequence: Unknown.

8. “I say 99 percent of repeat petitioners are mentally ill.”

Sun Dongdong, a Ministry of Health expert and a professor of Peking University, told the press that “99 percent of repeat petitioners are mentally ill.” Chinese law allows people to challenge government or judicial decisions they consider unfair by filing petitions to dedicated departments in most ministries and institutions.

Consequence: Dongdong apologized.

9. “Which media organization do you work for?”

Zhou Jihong, head of the Chinese national diving team, felt she was above the questionings of the press by asking the journalist “which media organization do you work for” when the journalist asked her about the rumor that she fixed the diving competitions at the 11th Chinese National Games.

Consequence: Unknown.

10. “Are you a member of the Communist Party (CPC)?”

A dog management office in Zhengzhou has received a storm of criticism for spending 7.3 million yuan ($1 million) in two years — money that came from charging license fees from dog owners — without providing more services to the public. An investigation was conducted by a local newspaper.

Wang Guanqi, a local official with the bureau of budget administration, refused an interview and asked the journalist, “Are you a member of CPC? And you have to get approval from our bureau CPC committee if you want an interview.”

Consequence: Unknown.

Posted in China, Fun | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Merry Christmas and Happy New Years!

Merry Christmas and happy New Years to everyone and…

May the spirit of Christmas bring you peace,
The gladness of Christmas give you hope,
The warmth of Christmas grant you love.

Happy Holidays!

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment

Govt-backed Gay Bar Finally Opens in China

Gay bars have been operating in China for the past 15 years, however, one in Dali, Yunnan has attracted international attention in the past few weeks because it is the first government funded gay bar in China.  After a three-week delay, the bar opened Saturday in a low-key fashion.

The bar was due to open on World AIDS Day on December 1st with the support of the local government; however, extremely negative reaction from the general public and intense media attention had forced the bar to close before opening.  Some volunteers at the bar stated that they were already ousted during trial operation in November even though they were not gay; some of them even had their pictures and names posted in the news.

Homosexuality in China was considered a mental illness until 2001 and today, it is still an extremely sensitive issue.  According to AFP, “gay men and women find it difficult to come out to their friends and family. One of the reasons lies in the nation’s one-child policy, which makes parents rely on their only child to marry and produce grandchildren.”

The newly opened gay bar aims to provide a place where homosexuals can meet in a relaxed atmosphere and get information about HIV/AIDS prevention.

According to China Daily, homosexuals in China came to around 30 million in 2005 but this figure is not reliable because few were willing to acknowledge their sexuality.

Do you think by opening a gay bar, the government has taken a correct step towards recognizing homosexuality?

Posted in China, Cultural Note | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Chinese Worker: Runner Up as Time’s Person of the Year 2009

The number 8 is sacred in China; in fact, it is the number that all important things revolve around.  We all know what happened on August 8th, 2008 at 8:08PM.

However, there’s another more important aspect of the number 8 in China today.  The Chinese have a word for it: baoba.  Baoba means “protect eight,” the 8% annual economic growth rate that officials believe is critical to ensuring social stability.  So when the world is in an economic slump, most people thought 8% was unattainable.

But China has done it and it remains the world’s fastest-growing major economy.

8% has been protected and the credit goes to the millions of Chinese workers; that is why the Chinese workers were nominated as the Time’s Person of the Year 2009.

Millions of Chinese workers leave their families behind to head for coastal cities such as Shenzhen and Guangzhou to work in factories that supply the world most of its goods.  In and near these factories, according to Time, are “the people who are leading the world to economic recovery: Chinese men and women, their struggles in the past, their thoughts on the present and their eyes on the future.”

Do you believe the Chinese workers should be Time’s Person of the Year? What sacrifices does China have to make to obtain 8% or above year after year.

Posted in China, Fun, World | Tagged , , | 1 Comment